Comments on: Infrastructure changes in Spring 2.1-m2 http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/ The voice of SpringSource Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:37:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Color me thrilled http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-27949 Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:56:55 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-27949 "I'm also pleased to announce that starting with the 2.1-m2 release, each Spring module will now have source jars in the Maven repository." This is the single best thing you could have included in this release, I just found this when I was checking for any related info before contacting you guys about this very issue. Thanks. "I'm also pleased to announce that starting with the 2.1-m2 release, each Spring module will now have source jars in the Maven repository."

This is the single best thing you could have included in this release, I just found this when I was checking for any related info before contacting you guys about this very issue.

Thanks.

]]> by: Colin Sampaleanu http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25937 Wed, 06 Jun 2007 03:18:11 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25937 I have to say I also prefer spring-portletmvc.jar to spring-webmvc-portlet. Colin I have to say I also prefer spring-portletmvc.jar to spring-webmvc-portlet.

Colin

]]> by: Ben Hale http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25693 Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:45:49 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25693 [quote comment="25669"]Why don't just include the portlet classes in the spring-web.jar?[/quote] Well this one is easier for me to answer than Erwin's. We've always made a distinction between our web support and our webmvc support. The -web jar contains all of the basic web support only. So for example, the DispatcherServlet goes there because it's not just used by MVC but also by the HttpInvoker, Hessian, and Burlap remoting support. Since the portlet support is really just another dialect of MVC, it made sense for it to go into a separate JAR as well. I've sent an email off to Juergen to have him chime in on this comment thread, but he'll be on vacation for a little while longer. Stay tuned for some more clarification. On June 4, 2007 at 4:50 am, -FoX- said:

Why don't just include the portlet classes in the spring-web.jar?

Well this one is easier for me to answer than Erwin's. We've always made a distinction between our web support and our webmvc support. The -web jar contains all of the basic web support only. So for example, the DispatcherServlet goes there because it's not just used by MVC but also by the HttpInvoker, Hessian, and Burlap remoting support. Since the portlet support is really just another dialect of MVC, it made sense for it to go into a separate JAR as well.

I've sent an email off to Juergen to have him chime in on this comment thread, but he'll be on vacation for a little while longer. Stay tuned for some more clarification.

]]> by: -FoX- http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25669 Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:50:26 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25669 Why don't just include the portlet classes in the spring-web.jar? Why don't just include the portlet classes in the spring-web.jar?

]]> by: Erwin Vervaet http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25461 Sat, 02 Jun 2007 06:59:37 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25461 spring-webmvc-portlet.jar?? That seems to be a bit of a strange name. I take it spring-webmvc.jar is still there? Why not have a spring-portletmvc.jar? spring-webmvc-portlet.jar??
That seems to be a bit of a strange name.
I take it spring-webmvc.jar is still there? Why not have a spring-portletmvc.jar?

]]> by: Ben Hale http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25399 Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:18:09 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25399 [quote post="170"]Thank you. [/quote] My pleasure. I deal with the Spring Maven artifacts quite a bit, so I know your frustration.

Thank you.

My pleasure. I deal with the Spring Maven artifacts quite a bit, so I know your frustration.

]]> by: Ismael Juma http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25396 Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:41:12 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/main/2007/06/01/infrastructure-changes-in-spring-21-m2/#comment-25396 [quote post="170"]I'm also pleased to announce that starting with the 2.1-m2 release, each Spring module will now have source jars in the Maven repository.[/quote] Thank you. :)

I'm also pleased to announce that starting with the 2.1-m2 release, each Spring module will now have source jars in the Maven repository.

Thank you. :)

]]>