<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle, Open Source and Commodization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.springsource.com/2006/10/28/oracle-open-source-and-commodization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2006/10/28/oracle-open-source-and-commodization/</link>
	<description>The voice of SpringSource</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: john beck</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2006/10/28/oracle-open-source-and-commodization/#comment-16024</link>
		<dc:creator>john beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2006/10/28/oracle-open-source-and-commodization/#comment-16024</guid>
		<description>I think that over the next five years, we will see more F/OSS, FL/OSS and even OSS versions of Oracle, DB2 and SQL Server. The model will likely be dual-licensing, plus up-sell of certain features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that over the next five years, we will see more F/OSS, FL/OSS and even OSS versions of Oracle, DB2 and SQL Server. The model will likely be dual-licensing, plus up-sell of certain features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
