Comments on: Spring Framework 3.0 RC3 released http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/ The voice of SpringSource Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:31:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: ryudaewan's me2DAY http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-170297 ryudaewan's me2DAY Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:41:40 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-170297 <strong>하얀말의 생각...</strong> Spring Framework 3.0 RC3 released… 오늘이 12/15구먼 Spring Framework 3.0 정식 버전은 과연 12월 중순에 나올 수 있을까…... 하얀말의 생각…

Spring Framework 3.0 RC3 released… 오늘이 12/15구먼 Spring Framework 3.0 정식 버전은 과연 12월 중순에 나올 수 있을까……

]]> By: Thinking Song http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-170010 Thinking Song Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:05:56 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-170010 I very much look forward to the release of Spring3.0 as soon as early I very much look forward to the release of Spring3.0 as soon as early

]]> By: Pavel Muller http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-169828 Pavel Muller Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:56:32 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-169828 Exactly. One of the features except convenience methods in our DataBinder was advanced handling of empty values. You need a WebDataBinder subclass for this and Spring 3.0 does not provide hooks to create custom data binders. Exactly. One of the features except convenience methods in our DataBinder was advanced handling of empty values. You need a WebDataBinder subclass for this and Spring 3.0 does not provide hooks to create custom data binders.

]]> By: xiaohng http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-169822 xiaohng Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:32:51 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-169822 I agree with the comment about the databinder.Without a way to create and use your own databinder implementation, the framework should provide enough hooks to invoke custom code, e.g. preBind, postBind handlers. Currently, We have a usecase where we need to do minimal default data validation against raw http input before the binding takes place. A preBind handler registable with the databinderinitializer. will meet the need. I agree with the comment about the databinder.Without a way to create and use your own databinder implementation, the framework should provide enough hooks to invoke custom code, e.g. preBind, postBind handlers. Currently, We have a usecase where we need to do minimal default data validation against raw http input before the binding takes place. A preBind handler registable with the databinderinitializer. will meet the need.

]]> By: Pavel Muller http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-169814 Pavel Muller Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:37:51 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-169814 Hello, I'm migrating our project to Spring 3.0. Most of the issues is resolved but one of them not. We used to create our own custom DataBinder in a AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter subclass. We used to override the createBinder() method and created our own DataBinder implementation there. How to achieve the same in Spring 3.0. The createBinder() method disappeared. Thank you. Pavel Muller AspectWorks Hello,

I'm migrating our project to Spring 3.0. Most of the issues is resolved but one of them not.

We used to create our own custom DataBinder in a AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter subclass. We used to override the createBinder() method and created our own DataBinder implementation there.

How to achieve the same in Spring 3.0. The createBinder() method disappeared.

Thank you.
Pavel Muller
AspectWorks

]]> By: http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-169813 Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:39:04 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-169813 good good

]]> By: Tetsuo http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-169779 Tetsuo Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:36:04 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-169779 What about WebFlow, will it get updated in a near future? Does it have to be updated to use the new features? What about WebFlow, will it get updated in a near future? Does it have to be updated to use the new features?

]]> By: Juergen Hoeller http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-169774 Juergen Hoeller Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:42:39 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-169774 Indeed, Spring 3.0 requires Java SE 5 (JDK 1.5) or above as the fundamental Java runtime but is at the same time compatible with Java EE (J2EE) 1.4 and above, as long as the J2EE server is running on Java SE 5. That's for example the case with WebSphere 6.1: formally a J2EE 1.4 server but running on IBM's JDK 1.5. It's also the case with Tomcat 5.5 which is typically running on JDK 1.5 too. I guess I wasn't as clear as I should have been in the main post; I'll update it accordingly. Indeed, Spring 3.0 requires Java SE 5 (JDK 1.5) or above as the fundamental Java runtime but is at the same time compatible with Java EE (J2EE) 1.4 and above, as long as the J2EE server is running on Java SE 5. That's for example the case with WebSphere 6.1: formally a J2EE 1.4 server but running on IBM's JDK 1.5. It's also the case with Tomcat 5.5 which is typically running on JDK 1.5 too.

I guess I wasn't as clear as I should have been in the main post; I'll update it accordingly.

]]> By: Bill Comer http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-169765 Bill Comer Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:20:32 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-169765 I am confused about the java5 & java 1.4 dependency. your post on <a href="http://blog.springsource.com/2009/09/29/spring-framework-3-0-rc1-released/" rel="nofollow">RC1</a> appears to say that it needs 5 or higher, yet this post appears to say that 1.4 is OK. I have also been repeatedly told at Spring talks that it requires Java5. Please can you further clarify. I am confused about the java5 & java 1.4 dependency.

your post on RC1 appears to say that it needs 5 or higher,
yet this post appears to say that 1.4 is OK.

I have also been repeatedly told at Spring talks that it requires Java5.

Please can you further clarify.

]]> By: Obtaining Spring 3 Artifacts with Maven | SpringSource Team Blog http://blog.springsource.org/2009/12/01/spring-framework-3-0-rc3-released/comment-page-1/#comment-169761 Obtaining Spring 3 Artifacts with Maven | SpringSource Team Blog Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:56:04 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=3333#comment-169761 [...] below. Keep in mind that as of this writing, Spring 3 final is not out yet (the latest version is Release Candidate 3 – [...] [...] below. Keep in mind that as of this writing, Spring 3 final is not out yet (the latest version is Release Candidate 3 – [...]

]]>