Comments on: Using an OSGi Profile with Bundlor http://blog.springsource.org/2009/05/18/using-an-osgi-profile-with-bundlor/ The voice of SpringSource Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:31:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Attorneys http://blog.springsource.org/2009/05/18/using-an-osgi-profile-with-bundlor/comment-page-1/#comment-178708 Attorneys Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:22:31 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1946#comment-178708 Going to give Bundlor another go, is this post still up to date? I saw that the maven code sample uses 1.0.0.M2 whereas the text refers to M4. I can easily move all that to 1.0.0.RELEASE, but I think it would be good to update the post, as it ranks higher than the documentation in google. Going to give Bundlor another go, is this post still up to date? I saw that the maven code sample uses 1.0.0.M2 whereas the text refers to M4. I can easily move all that to 1.0.0.RELEASE, but I think it would be good to update the post, as it ranks higher than the documentation in google.

]]> By: منتديات http://blog.springsource.org/2009/05/18/using-an-osgi-profile-with-bundlor/comment-page-1/#comment-173918 منتديات Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:14:28 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1946#comment-173918 While it's Maven-specific, it'd be a v nice feature to have. While it's Maven-specific, it'd be a v nice feature to have.

]]> By: Iwein Fuld http://blog.springsource.org/2009/05/18/using-an-osgi-profile-with-bundlor/comment-page-1/#comment-171539 Iwein Fuld Sun, 07 Mar 2010 11:19:30 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1946#comment-171539 Hey Ben, Going to give Bundlor another go, is this post still up to date? I saw that the maven code sample uses 1.0.0.M2 whereas the text refers to M4. I can easily move all that to 1.0.0.RELEASE, but I think it would be good to update the post, as it ranks higher than the documentation in google. Cheers, Iwein Hey Ben,

Going to give Bundlor another go, is this post still up to date? I saw that the maven code sample uses 1.0.0.M2 whereas the text refers to M4. I can easily move all that to 1.0.0.RELEASE, but I think it would be good to update the post, as it ranks higher than the documentation in google.

Cheers,
Iwein

]]> By: Neale http://blog.springsource.org/2009/05/18/using-an-osgi-profile-with-bundlor/comment-page-1/#comment-168380 Neale Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:18:08 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1946#comment-168380 Ben, Your example profile is no longer available in fisheye. Could you link to something more permanent please? P.S. Finally submitted that issue as https://issuetracker.springsource.com/browse/BNDLR-284. Ben,

Your example profile is no longer available in fisheye. Could you link to something more permanent please?

P.S. Finally submitted that issue as https://issuetracker.springsource.com/browse/BNDLR-284.

]]> By: Ben Hale http://blog.springsource.org/2009/05/18/using-an-osgi-profile-with-bundlor/comment-page-1/#comment-167604 Ben Hale Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:45:01 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1946#comment-167604 @Neale In general I'd sort of thought that a profile would be checked in with each project. This shouldn't be a requirement, and your idea is a good one. Why don't you open a user story on https://issuetracker.springsource.com/browse/BNDLR and I'll get on it. @Neale

In general I'd sort of thought that a profile would be checked in with each project. This shouldn't be a requirement, and your idea is a good one. Why don't you open a user story on https://issuetracker.springsource.com/browse/BNDLR and I'll get on it.

]]> By: Neale http://blog.springsource.org/2009/05/18/using-an-osgi-profile-with-bundlor/comment-page-1/#comment-167591 Neale Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:35:44 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1946#comment-167591 Having just started using Bundlor, this looks good. However, where do we get the profile from? In the same way as my Maven POMs can have a parent, why not allow OSGi profiles to be specified in the Maven plugin as artifacts. That way, I can specify specify dm Server v2.0 as a profile, and so long as I have the EBR as a repos, Bundlor can resolve it and load the enclosed .profile. This would also mean that I (and many others) can deploy my own OSGi profiles. While it's Maven-specific, it'd be a v nice feature to have. Having just started using Bundlor, this looks good.

However, where do we get the profile from?

In the same way as my Maven POMs can have a parent, why not allow OSGi profiles to be specified in the Maven plugin as artifacts. That way, I can specify specify dm Server v2.0 as a profile, and so long as I have the EBR as a repos, Bundlor can resolve it and load the enclosed .profile.

This would also mean that I (and many others) can deploy my own OSGi profiles.

While it's Maven-specific, it'd be a v nice feature to have.

]]>