Comments on: Oracle Adds New Exhibit to Java Technology Museum http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/ The voice of SpringSource Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:29 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: O que Significa para o Java a Aquisição Planejada da Sun pela Oracle « Templário da Tecnologia http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-167227 O que Significa para o Java a Aquisição Planejada da Sun pela Oracle « Templário da Tecnologia Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:19:21 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-167227 [...] em várias JSRs incluindo aquelas para JSF e EJB. E mesmo se eles não manterem o investimento, argumenta Rod Johnson da SpringSource, isso não deve significar muito: “…inovação em volta da plataforma Java há muito [...] [...] em várias JSRs incluindo aquelas para JSF e EJB. E mesmo se eles não manterem o investimento, argumenta Rod Johnson da SpringSource, isso não deve significar muito: "…inovação em volta da plataforma Java há muito [...]

]]> By: Springsteam - Next Generation Java Development | Spring . ICEfaces . Flex/AIR . 3D » Blog Archive » I Like This Uncompromising Style of Rod http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-167127 Springsteam - Next Generation Java Development | Spring . ICEfaces . Flex/AIR . 3D » Blog Archive » I Like This Uncompromising Style of Rod Wed, 27 May 2009 23:28:57 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-167127 [...] Oracle Adds New Exhibit to Java Technology Museum [...] [...] Oracle Adds New Exhibit to Java Technology Museum [...]

]]> By: SpringSource Acquires Hyperic | Blogging Hyperic http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-165243 SpringSource Acquires Hyperic | Blogging Hyperic Mon, 04 May 2009 11:54:46 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-165243 [...] excited about the huge opportunity this combined company represents. In an time where mergers among goliaths are the norm, the teams behind two fast growing, young companies are combining to provide the world [...] [...] excited about the huge opportunity this combined company represents. In an time where mergers among goliaths are the norm, the teams behind two fast growing, young companies are combining to provide the world [...]

]]> By: garangnip's me2DAY http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-164615 garangnip's me2DAY Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:07:30 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-164615 꾸우ì?˜ ìƒ?ê°?…

Oracle does not own that future. One of the great strengths of Java is its developer and open source community. – Rod Johnson -…

]]> By: geekinside's me2DAY http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-164613 geekinside's me2DAY Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:41:29 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-164613 gEEkInsIdEì?˜ ìƒ?ê°?…

(BEA & SUN) Both companies represent the history of enterprise Java, and are far less important to the future. – Rod Johnson…

]]> By: MyÅ¡lenky dne otce Fura » Blog Archive » Spring One - po prvním dni http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-164603 MyÅ¡lenky dne otce Fura » Blog Archive » Spring One - po prvním dni Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:16:34 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-164603 [...] rozvoj Java platformy, jako to Sun dÄ›lal dosud. Svůj názor si můžete udÄ›lat již z Ä?lánku Roda zveÅ™ejnÄ›ném na blogu SpringSource. Å el dokonce tak daleko, že projevil pochybnosti nad dalším fungováním JCP. Podle jeho [...]

]]> By: Wayne Lund http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-164591 Wayne Lund Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:29:03 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-164591 Adrian, I thought originally there was major concern when Oracle bought SleepyCat a few years ago, which included InnoDB, that it would have a negative impact on MySQL. There were jokes about changing the name to OurSQL since the txn engine for MySQL was based on InnoDB. It seems like all those fears were unrealized - unless you count this acquisition. Should be a very interesting JavaOne this year. And just when MySQL was getting very interesting to the Enterprise. Adrian,

I thought originally there was major concern when Oracle bought SleepyCat a few years ago, which included InnoDB, that it would have a negative impact on MySQL. There were jokes about changing the name to OurSQL since the txn engine for MySQL was based on InnoDB. It seems like all those fears were unrealized – unless you count this acquisition. Should be a very interesting JavaOne this year. And just when MySQL was getting very interesting to the Enterprise.

]]> By: Prashant Saraf http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-164555 Prashant Saraf Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:33:31 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-164555 Let's wait and watch. JavaOne may have something.. And Don't worry Java is Open Source :) The thing I miss is I can't Say "Sun Java is Fun Java" :) Let's wait and watch. JavaOne may have something.. And Don't worry Java is Open Source :) The thing I miss is I can't Say "Sun Java is Fun Java" :)

]]> By: zack http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-164537 zack Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:21:10 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-164537 ... but unfortunately Oracle acquisition of Sun Microsystems. Maybe IBM is a better choice than... --- Though IBM takes the position it does, not to make life better for the Open Source community or to advance the position of free software. IBM takes the position it does because this position ultimately creates more value for its shareholders ---- And,It will be fine? … but unfortunately Oracle acquisition of Sun Microsystems.
Maybe IBM is a better choice than…
—

Though IBM takes the position it does, not to make life better for the Open Source community or to advance the position of free software. IBM takes the position it does because this position ultimately creates more value for its shareholders
—-

And,It will be fine?

]]> By: Luis Espinal http://blog.springsource.com/2009/04/20/oracle-adds-new-exhibit-to-java-technology-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-164502 Luis Espinal Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:48:14 +0000 http://blog.springsource.com/?p=1666#comment-164502 "BEA Systems, the hottest company in enterprise Java…until around 2001" /sarcasm much? Other than that, I like the points made in this article. It's been quite unfortunate that Sun and the tritilodontian koolaid that is EJB has actually slowed down innovation in Java technology. It's been this insistence in obsolete technologies that attempt to solve 1% of enterprise that have driven developers to create excellent frameworks to solve the remaining 99%. It is, however, short sighted, to assign a negative connotation, or to tag defeat prematurely to this particular move by Oracle. Just because the enterprise has been unable to provide the feasible future to Java that open source developers have until now, that does not logically necessitate that an enterprise merger such as this is forever doomed to innovative failure. I can understand the desire to tooth the open source horn. From the Spring corner, it makes business sense. It also makes sense to see it for what it is. I, for one, am just going to wait and see. I welcome innovation wherever its source. "BEA Systems, the hottest company in enterprise Java…until around 2001"

/sarcasm much?

Other than that, I like the points made in this article. It's been quite unfortunate that Sun and the tritilodontian koolaid that is EJB has actually slowed down innovation in Java technology. It's been this insistence in obsolete technologies that attempt to solve 1% of enterprise that have driven developers to create excellent frameworks to solve the remaining 99%.

It is, however, short sighted, to assign a negative connotation, or to tag defeat prematurely to this particular move by Oracle. Just because the enterprise has been unable to provide the feasible future to Java that open source developers have until now, that does not logically necessitate that an enterprise merger such as this is forever doomed to innovative failure.

I can understand the desire to tooth the open source horn. From the Spring corner, it makes business sense. It also makes sense to see it for what it is. I, for one, am just going to wait and see. I welcome innovation wherever its source.

]]>