<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Request-Reply JMS with Spring 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/</link>
	<description>The voice of SpringSource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:57:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Price Comparison</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-169589</link>
		<dc:creator>Price Comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-169589</guid>
		<description>I can understand the effort behind the posting the code 

 this will request for the queue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the effort behind the posting the code </p>
<p> this will request for the queue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajax</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-167072</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-167072</guid>
		<description>Cool, nice news!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, nice news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echo</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-135209</link>
		<dc:creator>echo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-135209</guid>
		<description>i love it :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love it <img src='http://blog.springsource.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-115173</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-115173</guid>
		<description>Anyone know if there is a way to prefix the names of the queues that are created dynamically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know if there is a way to prefix the names of the queues that are created dynamically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forex currency trading</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-114395</link>
		<dc:creator>forex currency trading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-114395</guid>
		<description>I would like to thanks you for ur sincere efforts in writing this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to thanks you for ur sincere efforts in writing this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolando</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-106058</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-106058</guid>
		<description>Great stuff!

But I have a question:  

When the connectionFactory brokerUrl is changed to ssl://192.168.0.2:443, where 192.168.0.2 could be any valid address other than localhost, and the environment variable ACTIVEMQ_OPTS is set to

-Xmx512M -Dorg.apache.activemq.UseDedicatedTaskRunner=true  -Dderby.storage.fileSyncTransactionLog=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore=C:\work\ActiveMQ401\broker.ks -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=secret  -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=c:\work\ActiveMQ401\broker.ts   -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=secret

performance slows down to approximately 1/2 min. per message/response compared to less than 1 sec. when set to tcp://192.168.0.2:61616.

Does it mean this is unusable in production environments?

Thanks,
Rolando</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff!</p>
<p>But I have a question:  </p>
<p>When the connectionFactory brokerUrl is changed to ssl://192.168.0.2:443, where 192.168.0.2 could be any valid address other than localhost, and the environment variable ACTIVEMQ_OPTS is set to</p>
<p>-Xmx512M -Dorg.apache.activemq.UseDedicatedTaskRunner=true  -Dderby.storage.fileSyncTransactionLog=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore=C:\work\ActiveMQ401\broker.ks -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=secret  -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=c:\work\ActiveMQ401\broker.ts   -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=secret</p>
<p>performance slows down to approximately 1/2 min. per message/response compared to less than 1 sec. when set to tcp://192.168.0.2:61616.</p>
<p>Does it mean this is unusable in production environments?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Rolando</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-79233</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-79233</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s try again...

	&lt;jms:listener-container connection-factory=&quot;connectionFactory&quot;
		container-type=&quot;default&quot; destination-type=&quot;queue&quot; &gt;
		&lt;jms:listener destination=&quot;requestQueue&quot; 
			ref=&quot;registrationService&quot; method=&quot;processRequest&quot; /&gt;
	&lt;/jms:listener-container&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s try again&#8230;</p>
<p>	&lt;jms:listener-container connection-factory=&#034;connectionFactory&#034;<br />
		container-type=&#034;default&#034; destination-type=&#034;queue&#034; &gt;<br />
		&lt;jms:listener destination=&#034;requestQueue&#034;<br />
			ref=&#034;registrationService&#034; method=&#034;processRequest&#034; /&gt;<br />
	&lt;/jms:listener-container&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-79232</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-79232</guid>
		<description>Sorry, it&#039;s me again because I&#039;ve forgot to quote the xml...

[quote post=&quot;147&quot;]	
		
	
[/quote]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, it&#039;s me again because I&#039;ve forgot to quote the xml&#8230;</p>
<p>[quote post="147"]	</p>
<p>[/quote]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-79231</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-79231</guid>
		<description>Hi I&#039;m testing spring 2.5. So I&#039;ve been porting the sample using the new JMS namespace. So, while the original sample is working fine, when I change the content of server-context.xml like here:

	
	
	
		
	

I get the following exception

Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: blog.jms.remoting.RegistrationServiceImpl.processRequest(org.springframework.remoting.support.RemoteInvocation)

I think I&#039;ve to write a custom message converter but I do not understand why

Thanks
Andrea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I&#039;m testing spring 2.5. So I&#039;ve been porting the sample using the new JMS namespace. So, while the original sample is working fine, when I change the content of server-context.xml like here:</p>
<p>I get the following exception</p>
<p>Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: blog.jms.remoting.RegistrationServiceImpl.processRequest(org.springframework.remoting.support.RemoteInvocation)</p>
<p>I think I&#039;ve to write a custom message converter but I do not understand why</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Andrea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anek</title>
		<link>http://blog.springsource.com/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/comment-page-1/#comment-53224</link>
		<dc:creator>anek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/04/04/request-reply-jms-with-spring-20/#comment-53224</guid>
		<description>Great post,
But what about performance?
When testing the performance of this request/reply solution, it turns out that only about 14 requests per second gets processed at full speed on a &quot;yesteryear&quot;-machine.
(Just using a loop that sends the next request when the reply arrives)

Is this somehow due to lack of pooling?
Or is it maybe that the proxy creates a new temporary reply queue for each request?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post,<br />
But what about performance?<br />
When testing the performance of this request/reply solution, it turns out that only about 14 requests per second gets processed at full speed on a &#034;yesteryear&#034;-machine.<br />
(Just using a loop that sends the next request when the reply arrives)</p>
<p>Is this somehow due to lack of pooling?<br />
Or is it maybe that the proxy creates a new temporary reply queue for each request?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
